Webinar: Does GeoAI Promise an Ethical Future for Spatial Analytics?
Date and Time: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 8:00 am - 10:30 am U.S. Pacific Time
Chair(s) of the Webinar and Organizing Committee Member(s): Michael F. Goodchild. Co-chairs include Stewart Fotheringham, Wenwen Li.
Host(s) of the Webinar: Co-organized with ASU Spatial Analysis Research Center (SPARC), School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning (SGSUP)
Will there be a recording? Yes
In recent years, Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) has become the focus of a new wave of data-driven spatial analytics. This emerging technology benefits from recent advances in deep machine learning and high-performance computing, and has the capability to process large volumes of geospatial data to support knowledge discovery at scale. In just a few years, we have seen a flourishing of research projects and publications in this area, introducing exciting new techniques ranging from analysis of remotely sensed images to information extraction and natural language processing, and to the spatial and semantic reasoning of large-scale knowledge graphs. These techniques have played an increasing role in understanding the ever-evolving social and environmental systems found in the real world, as well as the interaction between them, such as modeling the spread of infectious diseases, quantifying the melting rate of sea ice in the Arctic, and predicting presidential voting outcomes.
However, because of its data-driven and theory-free nature, GeoAI research possibly generates as much skepticism as enthusiasm. For example, many GeoAI methods involve supervised learning, meaning that training data containing ground-truth information are needed for the algorithm to learn new patterns and make predictions. While training data contain potential bias in terms of sampled locations and socioeconomic factors, the transferability and replicability of a trained model will also be questioned. In addition, GeoAI models can be hard to interpret given their highly complex and non-linear nature, thereby reducing confidence in their solutions. In addition, despite the technical advances, GeoAI still faces challenges in its ability to conduct self-supervised or weakly supervised learning, such that predictive performance can be less dependent on the quality, size, and diversity of the training data. Other challenges including how to improve model efficiency to enable real-time GeoAI for time-critical applications. These issues are worthy of further attention from the geospatial community.
Recently numerous aspects of scientific practice have come under scrutiny, and concerns have been raised about the degree to which they reflect ethical ideals. Many of the questions raised in the early 1990s about GIS—equity in training and access, bias and oversimplification in representation, the potential for surveillance—can also be raised about GeoAI.
Consequently, topics of the workshop include:
• GeoAI for surveillance
• Transparency in GeoAI
• Explainable GeoAI
• Reproducibility and replicability of GeoAI
• Propagation of data uncertainty through GeoAI
• Real-time GeoAI
• Next-generation GeoAI models
• What makes an AI application “GeoAI”?
This webinar is being organized by ASU/SPARC, a multi-year conversation over the ethical issues that arise in geographic research, as the 2022 online edition of the SPARC workshop series (https://sgsup.asu.edu/sparc/workshops), and as one of the GeoEthics series of webinars that was initiated in February 2021.
The webinar will be scheduled for 2.5 hours. The topic will be introduced by the co-chairs, who will explain the structure of the webinar and its objectives, and the importance of follow-on actions and activities. The moderator will then introduce each of the speakers, each of whom will be asked to speak for no more than 20 minutes on some mix of the topics. These initial presentations will be followed by a moderated session of questions from the audience. The webinar will end with a review of follow-on activities by the co-chairs.
During the webinar, we will describe a process for follow-on activities. Participants will be given the opportunity to provide a 2-page position paper describing their interest in the topics of the webinar and in potential subsequent activities, along with a 2-page resume, within two weeks after the webinar. We will use these to create a number of topic areas for further exploration, and schedule a follow-on in-person workshop on ASU campus in October or November 2022 in which we can drill down to greater detail about GeoAI research and how it can be further advanced scientifically, and how it can be leveraged to create significant societal benefits. Participants of the webinar and those who submit a position paper will become potential invitees/speakers for the in-person workshop at ASU. We look forward to using this series of events to keep up the momentum in the community to advance GeoAI research, and to maintain interest in the GeoEthics project. Funds will be provided to cover the travel cost of invited participants. We are looking to diversify the attendees in terms of academic background, gender, race and other aspects. Women and underrepresented minorities will be especially encouraged to apply.
This conversation is the closing webinar in our GeoEthics Series and is a joint-event with the annual workshop series of the Spatial Analysis Research Center (SPARC) at Arizona State University.
ASU SPARC Workshop Series https://sgsup.asu.edu/sparc/workshops
Michael F. Goodchild University of California, Santa Barbara, Arizona State University
Michael F. Goodchild (chair) is a global leader in Geographic Information Science who joined ASU’s faculty in 2017. He is Emeritus Professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where he directed the National Center for Geographic Information Analysis, the Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science, and the Center for Spatial Studies. Professor Goodchild is an elected member of the National Academy of Sciences and Foreign Member of the Royal Society of Canada, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and is a Foreign Member of the Royal Society and Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy. In 2007 he received the Prix Vautrin Lud, considered the highest honor in the field of geography.
Stewart Fotheringham Arizona State University
Stewart Fotheringham (co-chair, panelist) is a Regents’ Professor of Computational Spatial Science in the School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning at Arizona State University. He is also Director of the Spatial Analysis Research Center (SPARC) and a Distinguished Scientist in the Institute for Global Futures. He is a member of the US National Academy of Sciences and of Academia Europaea and a Fellow of the UK’s Academy of Social Sciences. He has been awarded over $15m in funding, published 12 books and over 200 research publications. His research interests are in the analysis of spatial data sets using statistical, mathematical and computational methods. He is well-known in the fields of spatial interaction modeling and local statistical analysis. He has substantive interests in health data, crime patterns, retailing and migration. He has been awarded the Lifetime Achievement Award by the Chinese Professional Association of GIS and the Distinguished Research Honors Award by the American Association of Geographers.
Peter Kedron Arizona State University
Peter Kedron (panelist) is an associate professor in the School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning at Arizona State University and a core faculty member of the Spatial Analysis Research Center (SPARC). His research interests include geographic information science, spatial analysis, and economic geography. Peter's current research examines epistemological issues in the human environment and geographic sciences with a focus on reproducibility and replicability. He is working to find better ways to design research, accumulate evidence, and put that evidence to use.
May Yuan University of Texas at Dallas
May Yuan (panelist) studies geographic complexity and dynamics in GIS with emphases on the cognitive process in GIS knowledge production from conceptualization and representation to computation. Her recent research explores latent geographic concepts in machine learning algorithms and AI implications for advancing GIScience and ethical science practices.
Yu Liu Peking University
GeoAI for Geographical Knowledge Discovery
Artificial intelligence, as a new and powerful paradigm, is reshaping most scientific disciplines including physics and chemistry. Geography is no exception in this trend. An important task of geographical studies is to discover knowledge, including identifying spatio-temporal patterns, uncovering driving factors, so that we can make predictions and optimizations. In geographical knowledge discovery, a critical issue is to seek the tradeoff between universality and spatial heterogeneity. This is also a key challenge in the learning procedure of artificial intelligence. In general, a high-accuracy model with reasonable generalizability is always the objective of learning methods. In this sense, geography provides an ideal testing ground for AI techniques. Hence, geo-AI should incorporate a number of inductive biases and learning biases, including the formal representations of spatial effects such as spatial dependency, distance decay, and scale effect, into the implementation of AI methods. This may be a promising approach to supporting geographical knowledge discovery.
Yu Liu (speaker) is Boya Professor of GIScience at Peking University. His research interests focus on analytical methods for various big geo-data.
Renee E. Sieber McGill University
GeoAI for the Rest of Us
Most artificial intelligence (AI) Ethics frameworks have trouble articulating how best to engage civil society. Often it is the non-civil society actors, government or industry, who determine what constitutes acceptable algorithmic justice. The goals tend to be trust- or literacy-based, which in models of civic engagement, offer the lowest forms of participation. Even though they are tied to rights-based ethics, AI ethics tends not to draw redlines of which algorithms should be developed and which should be avoided. In a field that prizes performance and accuracy in an ethic, there currently is no welcomed discussion of a GeoAI Ethic that includes lived experience and non-technical experts. This is a shame considering the long tradition of participatory mapping, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Society, and public participation/participatory GIS. Drawing on those traditions as well as the technical elements of GIScience and AI, I will build the scaffold of that inclusive GeoAI Ethic.
Renee E. Sieber (speaker) is an Associate Professor of Geography at McGill University. Her research interests center on the use of information technology by marginalized communities, community-based organizations, and social movements.
Krzysztof Janowicz University of California, Santa Barbara
Diverse Data! Diverse Schemata?
The availability of large amounts of heterogeneous data is one of the fuels powering the current progress in GeoAI. Technologies and paradigms such as knowledge graphs claim to enable semantic interoperability, i.e., integrating data across different themes and domains, to provide this kind of AI fuel. But why do we aim at interoperability in the first place? A common answer to this question is that each individual data source only contains partial information about some phenomenon of interest. Consequently, combining multiple diverse datasets provides a more holistic perspective and enables us to answer more complex questions, e.g., those that span between the physical sciences and the social sciences. Interestingly, while these arguments are well established and go by different names, e.g., 'variety in the realm of big data, we seem less clear about whether the same arguments apply on the level of schemata. Put differently, we want diverse data, but do we also want diverse schemata or a single one to rule them all?
Krzysztof Janowicz (speaker) is Professor for GIScience/Geoinformatics at the University of California, Santa Barbara and director of the Center for Spatial Studies. His research focuses on how humans conceptualize the space around them based on their behavior, focusing particularly on regional and cultural differences with the ultimate goal of assisting machines to better understand the information needs of an increasingly diverse user base. Janowicz's expertise in AI-based knowledge representation and retrieval as they apply to spatial and geographic data, e.g., in the form of knowledge graphs.
Wenwen Li Arizona State University
Artificial Intelligence in Environmental and Terrain Analysis: A Journey of GeoAI
GeoAI has emerged as an exciting research area that supports big data analytics, pattern recognition, real-time prediction, and the creation of foundational datasets addressing crucial scientific questions, such as those related to global climate change. This talk introduces a series of the author's works in developing novel GeoAI models for natural feature detection on Earth and other planets. It started with a simple binary object detection problem for crater detection and became extended to multi-type and multi-source object detection. To reduce the cost of data labeling, the author developed a weakly supervised object detection model to achieve high-performance detection leveraging weak labels and Tobler’s First Law of Geography. This talk will discuss more broadly recent trends in GeoAI, including the improvement of the model's replicability and interpretability, as well as the desire for the (re)formulation of GIScience based on how GeoAI, as a new form of spatial analytics, is being used in scientific and practical problem solving.
Wenwen Li (co-chair, moderator, speaker) is a Professor in GIScience in the School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University. She also directs the Cyberinfrastructure and Computational Intelligence Lab (http://cici.lab.asu.edu/). Her research interests include cyberinfrastructure, big data, geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI) and their applications in data-intensive environmental and social sciences, including global warming and Arctic change, terrain analysis, disaster relief, and water insecurity in underserved communities.
Does GeoAI Promise an Ethical Future for Spatial Analytics?
Description
Date and Time: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 8:00 am - 10:30 am U.S. Pacific Time
Status: Event Ended
Watch the Recording for this Webinar below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
Watch the Recording of below!
To Register for this Webinar (FREE):
- First Log into Your Account using AAG credentials
- You can create a free username and password with AAG
- If you are a member with AAG you can use your existing login credentials
- If you participated in AAG Annual Meetings (or other events) you may still have active login credentials
- Once logged in successfully, click on "Register" below, to submit a registration form.
- Register
Register (FREE) to attend this webinar:Register